Thursday, September 12, 2013
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Jewell
Sep 11: In the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit,   Case No. 10-35303. Appealed from the United States   District Court for the Eastern District of   Washington. The panel dismissed an action brought   by the Wild Fish Conservancy challenging the United States' diversion of water   from Icicle Creek, a tributary of the Wenatchee River and the Columbia River, to   the Leavenworth National Fish Hatchery.           
    The Appeals Court explains that   this appeal concerns the control of water necessary   to sustain native fish populations in Icicle Creek, a tributary of the Wenatchee   River, which is itself a tributary of the Columbia. The Wild Fish Conservancy   and Harriet S. Bullitt (collectively, the Conservancy) allege that the United   States is improperly diverting water from Icicle Creek to the Leavenworth   National Fish Hatchery (the Hatchery) and otherwise violating Washington State   law. The Appeals Court says, "We conclude that the Conservancy lacks prudential   standing to bring its claim that the Hatchery operation violates the Washington   water code, and that we lack jurisdiction to consider the Convervancy's other   claims because they either do not challenge final agency action or rest on   provisions of Washington law that are not   incorporated into federal reclamation law. Therefore, on de novo   review, we   dismiss this action."
      In its   summary the Appeals Court indicates, "As we have   often acknowledged, '[s]almon and hydropower are the two great natural resources   of the Columbia River Basin,' and ardent desires to promote one or the other   have yielded a century of conflict. . .   This iteration does not present the 'classic struggle between environmental and   energy interests' . .   .but instead   a more nuanced conflict between two entities seeking to repair the damage that   dams have done to the Basin's fisheries. Unlike the many cases we have decided   concerning the fate of fish in the Columbia River Basin, the claims before us   are not susceptible to federal judicial review. . ."
      Access the complete opinion (click   here). [#Water, #Wildlife, #Energy, #CA9]
  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 












 
 Posts
Posts
 
 


No comments:
Post a Comment