32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals
Monday, February 27, 2012
ATK Launch Systems, Inc. v. U.S. EPA
Feb 24: In the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit,  Case No. 10-1004,  consolidated with 10-1005,  10-1006, 11-1252, 11-1253, 11-1254. On Petitions for Review of a Final  Action of U.S.  EPA. The Appeals  Court explains that in these consolidated petitions, ATK Launch Systems, Inc., two Utah counties, and three Utah  cities seek partial  vacation of a final rule designating certain areas as nonattainment for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate  matter (PM2.5)  standard. Air  Quality Designations for the 2006 24-Hour  Fine Particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 74 Fed. Reg. 58,688 (Nov. 13, 2009)  (Final Rule). In particular, petitioners challenge the inclusion of parts of  Tooele and Box Elder Counties within the Salt  Lake City nonattainment  area. U.S. EPA concluded, upon applying its  nine-factor test for designations, that emissions  from eastern portions of both Box Elder County, including Brigham City and ATK's operations, and Tooele County, including Tooele City and Grantsville City,  contributed to nearby violations of the  24-hour PM2.5 standard in and around Salt Lake City.
      Petitioners' principal argument is that EPA was arbitrary and capricious in applying the nine-factor designation analysis,  arguing dissimilar treatment as compared to EPA's  analysis of the data for two east coast counties,  Warren County, New Jersey
 and Hartford County,  Connecticut, which EPA designated attainment.  Petitioners also object to EPA's use of a pollutant  transport model generally and its analysis  of wind data for Box Elder County specifically.  Finally, they question EPA's decision to include  ATK's operations in the nonattainment portion of  Box Elder County. 
     The Appeals Court said, "Because EPA's nine-factor  test is intended to be applied on a case-by-case  basis to account for diverse considerations,  including the varying effects of local topography and meteorology on PM2.5 dispersion, and  EPA
 reasonably explained  its designations, we deny the petitions for review." 
      The Appeals Court ruled further, "The record supports the  conclusion that, when PM2.5 levels are  most severe in Salt Lake  City, wind direction is sometimes from the northwest,  indicating contribution from Box Elder County. EPA's  analysis of the wind data and air basin conclusion about pollution transport was reasonably based upon 'the best  available information' . . .and  petitioners thus fail to demonstrate that EPA ignored new information or  otherwise was arbitrary or capricious."  
     And,  finally the Appeals Court said, "Petitioners do not dispute that ATK's operations occur below the inversion layer, which is  at about 1,500 feet, and, as  discussed, EPA reasonably concluded that meteorological  data indicated that emissions from eastern Box Elder  County, where ATK's operations occur, contribute to nearby violations of the PM2.5 standards. Petitioners fail to demonstrate that EPA  was arbitrary or capricious by  including ATK's operations within the nonattainment  area. Accordingly, we deny the petitions for  review."
      Access the complete opinion (click  here). [#Air,  #CADC]
 GET THE REST OF TODAY'S  NEWS (click  here)
32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals
32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 












 
 Posts
Posts
 
 

