Wednesday, June 8, 2011
Supreme Court Denies Hearing GE CERCLA Challenge
Jun 6: The  U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeals of General Electric Company,  Petitioner v. Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency,  et al. Case No. 10-871. Appealed from the  U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit (Case No. 09-5092, decided June 29, 2010  [See  WIMS 6/30/10], with a rehearing also denied on September 30,  2010.           
    In the case,  General Electric challenges the constitutionality of a statutory scheme  that authorizes U.S. EPA to issue orders, known as "unilateral  administrative orders" (UAOs) directing companies and others to clean up  hazardous waste for which they are responsible under the  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act  (CERCLA). In the D.C. Circuit, General Electric argued that the  statute, as well as the way in which EPA administers it, violated the Due  Process Clause because EPA issues UAOs without a hearing before a neutral  decisionmaker. The D.C.  Circuit said, "We disagree. To the extent the UAO regime implicates  constitutionally protected property interests by imposing compliance costs and  threatening fines and punitive damages, it satisfies due process because UAO  recipients may obtain a pre-deprivation hearing by refusing to comply and  forcing EPA to sue in federal court."  
     The Appeals  Court indicated that General Electric insists that the UAO scheme and EPA's  implementation of it nonetheless violate due process because the mere issuance  of a UAO can inflict immediate, serious, and irreparable damage by depressing  the recipient's stock price, harming its brand value, and increasing its cost of  financing. But, the Appeals Court said, ". .  .such -- 'consequential' injuries -- injuries resulting not from EPA's issuance  of the UAO, but from market reactions to it -- are insufficient to merit Due  Process Clause protection. We therefore affirm the district court's grant of  summary judgment to EPA. 
     Access the  Supreme Court docket for the case (click  here). Access the D.C. Circuit opinion that now stands (click  here). [*Remed, *SCOTUS]
 
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 












 
 Posts
Posts
 
 

