May 13: The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request to hear the case Upper Blackstone Water Pollution Abatement Dist. v. U.S. EPA, Case No. 12-797, appealed from the First Circuit decision supporting a U.S. EPA decision regarding certain effluent limitations imposed by EPA in a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System and a model the EPA incorporated into its analysis of the nitrogen-fueled cultural eutrophication [See WIMS 8/6/12].
In the case, the Appeals Court ruled, "Where the agency follows the proper procedures and acts with a reasonable basis, both its choice of scientific data and interpretation and application of that data to real world conditions are entitled to deference. . . Where the EPA did rely on the MERL model, the record reflects that it fully accounted for the model's shortcomings. . . The District's argument that the MERL model should have been excluded from consideration entirely is without merit. . . The EPA also followed the proper procedures for ensuring that the model received scrutiny not only from the permittee, but from the scientific community and the public. . . The EPA's determination, based on its analysis of the evidence before it as a whole, that a nitrogen limit of 5.0 mg/L was necessary to achieve Rhode Island's water quality standards was not a 'hunch[] or wild guess[]' but a rational exercise of judgment."
Access the Supreme Court Order (click here). Access the Supreme Court docket (click here). Access the complete First Circuit opinion (click here). [#Water, #CA1, #SupCt]
GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS
Access subscription information (click here)
Want to know more about WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click here).
33 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals
Posts
