Friday, January 27, 2012
Chevron v. Naranjo
Jan 26:  In the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Case Nos. 11-1150 - 11-1264. Defendants-appellants   residents of the Ecuadorian Amazon and their American attorney  challenge a preliminary injunction issued by the district  court that prohibited them from enforcing or  preparing to enforce a potential Ecuadorian judgment against plaintiff-appellee  anywhere outside of the Republic of Ecuador. The  Appeals Court ruled, "Because New York's Uniform Foreign Country Money-Judgments Recognition Act, N.Y. C.P.L.R. §§  5301-5309, does not authorize affirmative relief  of this kind, but only recognizes a defense available when a would-be judgment-creditor first attempts enforcement in New York, we  vacate the injunction and remand to the district  court with instructions to dismiss the plaintiff-appellee's complaint."         
    The Appeals  Court provides the background saying, "This appeal represents the  latest chapter in the ongoing litigation between plaintiff-appellee Chevron Corp. (Chevron) and the defendants-appellants,  elsewhere known as the Lago Agrio Plaintiffs  (LAPs or Ecuadorians) and their American attorney Steven Donziger. Chevron brought the present action in part under New York's  Uniform Foreign Country Money-Judgments  Recognition Act (the Recognition Act), N.Y. C.P.L.R. §§ 5301-5309, which allows judgment-creditors to enforce foreign  judgments in New York courts, subject to several  exceptions. Chevron, a potential judgment-debtor, sought a global anti-enforcement injunction against the LAPs and Donziger  prohibiting the latter from attempting to enforce  an allegedly fraudulent judgment entered by an Ecuadorian court against Chevron."
     The Appeals Court explained  its decision further in its conclusion saying, "We have considered all of the parties' remaining arguments on appeal  and find them to be either rendered moot by our  disposition of this appeal or to pertain to litigation that is not properly before us. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons and consistent with our September 19, 2011 order, the judgment of the  district court is reversed and the preliminary injunction  vacated. We remand to the district court with the instruction to dismiss Chevron's claim for injunctive and declaratory  relief under the Recognition Act in its  entirety."
     Access the complete opinion (click  here). [#Remed,  #CA2]
 GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click  here)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 












 
 Posts
Posts
 
 

