Monday, March 29, 2010
Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamation
Mar 6: In the U.S. Court of  Appeals, Tenth Circuit, Case No. 05-2293. The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District  (MRGCD) challenges a final judgment entered on  its cross-claims brought pursuant to the Federal Quiet Title Act of 1972 (QTA), 28 U.S.C. § 2409a, in favor of the Secretary of  the Interior Ken Salazar, et al (collectively federal appellees).      
     Specifically, following a bench trial, the district court held that MRGCD's  claims were time-barred. The court ruled in the  alternative that, even if its claims were not  time-barred, MRGCD was judicially estopped from claiming that it owned the properties in question, and, furthermore, the  Federal appellees were entitled to judgment on  the merits. As to the limitations issue, the Appeals Court agreed with the  district court that MRGCD's quiet-title  action is time-barred. The Appeals Court said, however, "that the district  court did not have jurisdiction to decide the  merits of that action. Therefore, we remand to  the district court with instructions to vacate the portion of its judgment that  resolves the merits of MRGCD's quiet-title action  and to enter judgment on its jurisdictional dismissal of the claim."
     Access  the complete opinion (click  here).  
Labels:
10th Circuit,
Land
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)












