32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Olin Corp. v. Am. Home Assurance Co.
Dec 19: In the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, Case No.   11-4055. Appealed from an order of the United States District Court for the   Southern District of New York. The district court granted summary judgment to American Home   Assurance Company (American   Home) on the ground that the attachment point for its excess insurance policies   could not be reached by the alleged environmental damage   at Olin Corporation's (Olin) site at Morgan Hill,   California. In brief, the Appeals Court ruled, "We hold that the plain language   of Olin's policies with American Home requires American   Home to indemnify Olin for that damage. Accordingly, the judgment of the   district court is vacated and the case is remanded for   further proceedings."                  
    In concluding the Appeals Court said, ". .   .we conclude that the district   court's basis for granting summary judgment was in   error. Condition C obligates American Home to indemnify Olin not only for property damage occurring during the policy period, but also   for property damage arising from covered occurrences   that continues after the policy period. Three decades of perchlorate exposure and the damage it created are treated as a   single, multi-year occurrence for the purposes of this   policy. And because this single, multi-year occurrence took place in part   during each of the two policy periods here, the district   court was incorrect to conclude that neither policy   would be reached because of the allocation method. On the record before the   district court, $72.6 million in damage falls within the   coverage of the 1966-69 policy, while $62.7 million   falls within the coverage of the 1969-72 policy. These figures exceed the   American Home policies' $30.3 million attachment points.   On remand, American Home may demonstrate that these   attachment points cannot be reached for other reasons.   For example, this estimate of the years in which property damage occurred may be inaccurate. Or the evidence may permit the court to   assign greater damage to the years before the inception   of the two policies. We decide only that issues of material fact remain regarding American Home's   liability."
      Access   the complete opinion (click   here). [#Remed, #CA2]
  Want to know more about   WIMS? Check out our LinkedIn company website (click   here).
  GET THE REST OF TODAY'S   NEWS (click   here)
32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals
32 Years of Environmental Reporting for serious Environmental Professionals
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 












 
 Posts
Posts
 
 


No comments:
Post a Comment