Specifically, the district court concluded the permit's issuance did not comply with the requirements of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1376, and that the Plaintiff-Appellees had demonstrated they were entitled to preliminary injunctive relief. In this interlocutory appeal, Mosaic argues the district court's order was a de facto determination of the merits of the Clean Water Act issue that exceeded the proper scope of preliminary injunctive relief. Based upon our review of the briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we conclude the district court's remand of the permit to the Corps was improper because it was effectively a final judgment on the merits. The district court based the entry of the preliminary injunction entirely on letters from the Environmental Protection Agency which expressed concerns with the permit, and failed to apply the arbitrary and capricious standard in evaluating the Corps' practicable alternatives analysis.
Monday, April 25, 2011
Sierra Club v. U.S. Army COE
Apr 8: In the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, Case No.  10-13613. An unpublished opinion appealed from the United  States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.  Intervenor  Defendant-Appellant Mosaic  Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), a phosphate mining company engaged in significant operations in Hardee County, Florida,  appealed the order by the district court  remanding a mining-permit issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) back to the agency and further enjoining  Mosaic from conducting operations approved in  that permit.      
    In a brief, 3-page decision, the Appeals Court  ruled, "Based on the limited record  before us, and the lack of a response from the Corps on appeal, we are presently no better equipped to resolve this  dispute than was the district  court. We therefore vacate the preliminary injunction, set  aside the remand to the Corps, and remand this case to the  district court for consideration on the merits, after  receiving the full Administrative Record. Due to the unique circumstances presented by this case, we  direct the
 district court to stay the  issuance of the permit for 90 days from the date of this order to permit the district court to proceed to a merits determination  on the full record."
     Access the  complete opinion (click  here). [*Water]  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 












 
 Posts
Posts
 
 


No comments:
Post a Comment