Friday, July 23, 2010
State of California v. Hearthside Residential Corp.
State of California v. Hearthside Residential  Corp. - Jul 22: In the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth  Circuit, Case No. 09-55389. The Appeals  Court frames the case and says, "This appeal presents a question of first  impression whether 'owner and operator' status under the  Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and  Liability Act (CERCLA). . . is determined at the  time that cleanup costs are  incurred or instead at the time that a recovery lawsuit  seeking reimbursement is filed. We hold that the owner of the property at the time cleanup costs are  incurred is the current owner for purposes of  determining CERCLA  liability." The decision affirms  the district court's partial summary judgment grant  and remands the case for further proceedings not  inconsistent with this opinion.      
    The Appeals Court said  further, ". . .we are not persuaded that the limited factfinding required to determine when a recovery action accrued is burdensome enough to require a different outcome. As we  previously noted, a CERCLA recovery action accrues at  the point that recovery costs are incurred, and the  statute of limitations runs from the time a removal  action is completed or a  remedial action is begun on the site. 42 U.S.C. § 9613(g)(2). Thus, factual questions surrounding the relevant cleanup dates  are a routine and familiar  component of CERCLA actions, and courts are well  equipped to resolve such factual questions without great  difficulty. Given that CERCLA's policies promoting settlement and efficient cleanup support the Department's  position, we are not persuaded that the possible  necessity of determining the accrual date is sufficient  to tip the balance in favor of Hearthside's preferred  construction. We hold that current ownership for  purposes of liability under 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(1) is  measured from the time the recovery action accrues.  Because there is no dispute that Hearthside was the  owner of the Fieldstone Property at all times relevant to the remediation of the Residential Site, Hearthside is a current  owner. . ."
     Access  the complete opinion (click  here).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 












 
 Posts
Posts
 
 


No comments:
Post a Comment